Risk off Markets and Centralization Debates — Week in Review – Op-Ed Bitcoin News


Key points to remember:

  • Bitcoin Risks Drop Below $59,000 as PlanB Reports 200-Week MA; institutions dominate flows.
  • Google white paper claims 20x quantum gain, increasing risks for Bitcoin and Ethereum cryptography.
  • $260M-$285M Drift Protocol Mining Signals Grow Challenge hacks like Circle’s answer questioned.

Markets wobble as oil shock looms and institutions tighten their grip on Cryptocurrencyand quantum risks enter the framework

Bitcoin and Ethereum both traded sideways during the week, while Solana directed most of altcoin the market is falling again.

Stock indices made a surprise move, with the S&P500, Nasdaq and Dow Jones all up 4.34%, 3.3% and 2.9% respectively. Ram Ahluwalia pointed out that the rise in the S&P 500 during the first half of the week was largely due to mechanical offer driven by the end of the quarter volume a compression rather than a structural pressure on the buyers’ side.

Meanwhile, precious metals threatened to resume their multi-year price. bull market as gold and silver, both printed with green weeks. Gold is now up 14.7% from its March 23 low.

The war in the Middle East continues, but the fog of war seems to be thickening. When people like Jamie Dimon State that success in Iran is more important than the markets indicates that a shutdown is expected in at least a few weeks.

The general economic context is just starting to deteriorate while the physical oil shock has not yet occurred. Rory Johnston, on Hidden strengths this weeksaid:

We have yet to really feel the physical impact of the loss of Hormuz’s supplies. The last ship has not yet arrived. This latest ship will likely arrive in Asia this week, Europe next week, and North America the week after that. After the arrival of this ship, behind it there is nothing but air.”

Of course, we have already seen some governments prepare for the coming shock. Mr Johnston said this was mainly happening in Asian countries which, as soon as the strait closed, immediately began reducing their energy consumption.

Some reduction has started in Europe. There was the toothless EU statement that its inhabitants should travel less, and “reduce highway speed limits by ten kilometers (one hour)». Australia, nominally Asian but European in policy, received a similar result ineffective address of his Prime Minister. The Prime Minister of India reiterated the need to protect regional energy infrastructure in West Asia without any promise of hard power.

The US economy might have looked good before the conflict, perhaps the best it’s ever been since the end of 2023, but this oil shock promises to be recessionary. Ram Ahluwalia warned that one inflation The shock and rising energy costs are preparing to weigh on consumer spending, and “analysts have yet to cut their forward earnings estimates.” In other words:

Risk outside.”

Warren Buffett agrees, adage he expects other inconveniences in cash. Jamie Coutts warned this global liquidity the aggregates and the DXY flash bearish signals.

Luke Gromen outlined tough choices for the US Treasury, saying printing US dollars on peak oil is the most likely outcome, a feeling he reiterated to his peers. Adding to the dollar debate, JP Mayall published an interesting thesis that foreign central banks are accumulating gold is not a sign of dedollarization, but rather indirect exposure to US Treasuries.

Even though stocks rebounded and held onto most of their gains, crypto I bounced back and retraced most of them. The techniques offer a true Rorschach test to traders. PlanB published a rare bearish update, noting he would not be surprised to see a decline below the 200-week moving average ($59,000) and realized price ($54,000). Conversely, Jamie Coutts looked at Z-score indicators and concluded that, probabilistically, Bitcoin East near its hollow. CryptoQuant job than Binance ETH reserves decline while stable coins rise, creates a very favorable configuration for price expansion.

Technical analysisor astrology for men, probably doesn’t matter. As a complainant reminded everyoneif you look at the accumulation over the last six months, a lot of this market is really just Michael Saylor. Retail has largely disappeared, giving way to many corporate and institutional players. Reminder of the newsletter from two weeks ago:

Listen to it recent podcast with Haseeb and Santiago on why they think “tokens are dead.” Santiago argues that tokens do not capture real value, while Haseeb points out that the current marginal buyers are institutions and that, by and large, institutions do not buy tokens..”

The institutions seem to be having a field day. Franklin Templeton didn’t just create another crypto product; they launched a dedicated crypto division. Long-time skeptic Morgan Stanley appears to be making final adjustments throw their place Bitcoin ETFs next week.

This institutional and corporate drift is not always pretty. Coinbase was allegedly lobbied against a de minimis tax exemption for Bitcoin while pushing for one that benefits USDC. Meanwhile, Sam Altman’s Worldcoin Foundation chose to empty $65,000,000 WLD in OTC sales at all-time low.

The biggest crypto this week’s story came from a Google bomb quantum research paper which claims a 20x reduction over previous quantum systems for executing attacks on elliptic curve cryptography, the backbone of BitcoinEthereum and most blockchains. Nicholas Carter, Haseeb Qureshiand CEO of Coinbase Brian Armstrong take this research seriously. If a quantum article wasn’t enough, Nic Carter and Justin Drake underlines that another revolutionary article landed the same day.

THE Bitcoin The community, however, appears largely stuck in denial. Mert Mumtaz called one of the main methods to achieve this: what about duism. Jordi Visser, who argued that we should ignore the quantum threat to Bitcoin because AI agent swarms will break TradFi banks first, provided an excellent example whataboutism.

An even more common form of denial is the use of ad hominem statements. Bitcoiners attacked the Google newspaper because a co-author “actually works for the Ethereum Foundation.” Nic Carter’s concerns may be rejectedapparently, because he invested in a company focused on making quantum-resistant products. They are not serious people if they attack the character or motivations of people with quantum concerns instead of their assertions.

Jonas Schnelli told those concerned about quantum issues that it’s the developers and they need to step up their efforts. I hope Nic Carter isn’t right when he replied:

For a BIP to be adopted, approximately one in 5 people must defend it. We both know who they are. No PIF has been able to see the light of day without them over the last decade.»

The quantum security threat is future, but we face a slight increase in challenge hacks right now. Mr Qureshi job that the rise in exploits will likely get worse before it gets better, as attackers use the latest AI tools while defenders lag behind.

As if to prove a point, a few hours later, a $260-285 million exploit on Drift Protocol occurred. The hacker systematically emptied mainly JLP and stablecoins and actively exchange stolen assets for ETH. Austin Campbell note this is exactly the scenario in which Circle should have been forced to freeze USDC. ZachXBT shared his frustration this Circle was so slow to act. He wasn’t the only one.

Last week and this week we saw a classic crypto Discussion between centralization and decentralization. This time it was around Canton, where many locals crypto the sense of community is too centralized.

Canton Sales Manager claimed Canton has the “the deepest pool of institutional resources liquidity.” Omid Malekan replied that no one does business in Canton and that there is no verifiable economic activity. Austin Campbell agreed that no one trades at scale on-chain.

Regarding verifiability, Shaul Kfir, co-founder of Digital Asset, the company that designed, built and continues to develop the Canton network, admitted that a supply ceiling cannot be verified in Canton.

Rebecca Rettig of Jito Labs wrote a thread describing the debate as one between authorized and unauthorized channels, and victories without authorization. Omid Malekan wrote Canton’s authorized governance model is the same model as that of any private system in the commerce sector.

Mert Mumtaz from Helius joked: “Canton is a very fun way to spell “web 2 database with a token”. Basically, it’s not a blockchain.

Solana underwent its own internal centralized versus decentralized debate this week over the blockchainthe continued evolution of the consensus. FCFS (First-Come-First-Served) and MCP (Multiple Concurrent Proposers) are two contrasting approaches to blocking transaction production and ordering. To simplify, FCFS is faster, simpler, and more centralized than the current consensus setup, while MCP is slower, more complicated, price-preserving, and more decentralized.

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko favors MCP, but thinks the current hybrid setup is the worst of both worlds.

Finally, AI x crypto receives much less attention than a month ago, but Algod continues its incessant posting of Bittensor bulls, predicting several distribution subnetworks this year and a exponential increase quality driven by the talents of border laboratories.

-David Simple



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *